[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?) |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 15:14:28 +0300 |
> From: Uwe Brauer <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 13:02:37 +0200
>
> commit ff9c6df4b0766bef72f6b1f4c8fca65737d9ad6b
> Author: Jim Blandy <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat Dec 14 16:58:10 1985 +0000
>
> Initial revision
>
> What puzzles me, is that there were so few commits when starting the
> project and
>
> Jim Blandy <address@hidden>
>
> redhat in 1985, really?
>
> >From wikipedia:
> Founded in 1993, Red Hat has its corporate headquarters
>
> This is not really a serious issue, but I wondered whether the
> conversion process worked reliable, at least for the first commits.
You are looking at a log that was significantly edited by the various
conversions, including the email addresses of the authors. CVS stated
just the username, without any email address.
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?), Stefan Monnier, 2019/08/17
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?), John Wiegley, 2019/08/17