[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?) |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 15:18:03 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 15:14:28 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > commit ff9c6df4b0766bef72f6b1f4c8fca65737d9ad6b
> > Author: Jim Blandy <address@hidden>
> > Date: Sat Dec 14 16:58:10 1985 +0000
> >
> > Initial revision
> >
> > What puzzles me, is that there were so few commits when starting the
> > project and
> >
> > Jim Blandy <address@hidden>
> >
> > redhat in 1985, really?
> >
> > >From wikipedia:
> > Founded in 1993, Red Hat has its corporate headquarters
> >
> > This is not really a serious issue, but I wondered whether the
> > conversion process worked reliable, at least for the first commits.
>
> You are looking at a log that was significantly edited by the various
> conversions, including the email addresses of the authors. CVS stated
> just the username, without any email address.
Here's the same commit from CVS log:
revision 1.1
date: 1985-04-18 00:48:29 +0000; author: jimb; state: Exp;
branches: 1.1.18; 1.1.20; 1.1.24;
entered into RCS
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?), Stefan Monnier, 2019/08/17
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?), John Wiegley, 2019/08/17