|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: ELPA policy |
Date: | Sat, 9 May 2020 18:06:05 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 09.05.2020 09:22, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
And why do I have to submit bug reports against an ELPA package for violation of our coding conventions?
Because it's the only way how things can work well. Once we have a bug tracker that most maintainers like to use, that could change.
I'd expect the maintainer of the package to be asked to fix those as a precondition for accepting the package in GNU ELPA, or at least as a long-term plan to which the maintainer agreed in advance (in which case no bug report would have been necessary). What am I missing here?
You're missing that the maintainers don't have any contractual obligations. The more conditions we add, and the less effort we want to expend ourselves [forwarding bug reports], the higher the odds are that we end up with fewer contributions/stale code/untended bug reports.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |