[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: python.el: improve sexp-based navigation or make it optional?
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: python.el: improve sexp-based navigation or make it optional? |
Date: |
Sat, 16 May 2020 10:05:14 -0400 |
Hi,
immerrr again <address@hidden> writes:
> I wonder if it would be a welcome addition to
> introduce a configuration parameter that at least disables the smart
> navigation, making sexp skip one symbol or explicitly
> parenthesized/bracketed expression at a time.
I don't see any reason not to welcome such a contribution.
I happen to think the sexp-navigation in python-mode does a decent job
(read: it never bothered me), but why not give an option to users who
find it too unpredictable.
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas