Re: python.el: improve sexp-based navigation or make it optional?

[Andreas Röhler]

On 16.05.20 15:16, immerrr again wrote:
> In absence of such mode, I wonder if it would be a welcome addition to
> introduce a configuration parameter that at least disables the smart
> navigation, making sexp skip one symbol or explicitly
> parenthesized/bracketed expression at a time.

Maybe that does it?: (from python.el)

If you prefer `cc-mode'-like
;; `forward-sexp' movement, setting `forward-sexp-function' to nil is
;; enough, You can do that using the `python-mode-hook':

;; (add-hook 'python-mode-hook
;;           (lambda () (setq forward-sexp-function nil)))