Re: [PATCH] (icomplete-vertical-mode): Add support for affixations and, annotations

[Juri Linkov]

> Sure it's not beautiful, but it's an improvement to annotation-function.
> If affixation-function were a function of a single completion, it would
> be fine.  For a hint at a good design, look at the language server
> protocol.  It returns a large list of completions, and then you can
> "resolve" a completion to get many more of its properties.  So
> resolution-function is an option.

resolution-function sounds good.  Maybe this is not the most
suitable comparison but since you mentioned the word "resolve"
that evoked by association: resolver functions used in GraphQL.