[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions
From: |
xenodasein |
Subject: |
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2022 08:12:09 +0100 (CET) |
Nov 18, 2022, 06:59 by tomas@tuxteam.de:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 07:19:45AM +0100, xenodasein--- via Emacs development
> discussions. wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Why do you not consider __attribute__((always_inline)) an improvement
>> over macros where applicable?
>>
>
> I think you spelled it yourself: "where applicable": this is
> something which has to be considered on a case by case basis.
>
> Cheers
> --
> t
>
For you and me sure, I was curious about Richard's opinion.
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, (continued)
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Richard Stallman, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, xenodasein, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Po Lu, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, tomas, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions,
xenodasein <=
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2022/11/18
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Po Lu, 2022/11/15
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/15