[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions
From: |
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2022 17:16:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.8.11; emacs 28.1 |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> Why do you not consider __attribute__((always_inline)) an improvement
>> over macros where applicable?
>
> Can we drop this discussion. AFAIK all those who matter already
> explained clearly that we generally agree it's an improvement, but that
> it's not enough of an improvement to justify making the change just for
> the sake of it.
Thank you!
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, (continued)
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, xenodasein, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Po Lu, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, tomas, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, xenodasein, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/18
- Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions,
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide <=
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Po Lu, 2022/11/15
Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/15