Re: emacs-29 82d6bb66fea 4/5: Update HISTORY and ChangeLog.4

[Michael Albinus]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

Hi Eli,

>> What about this compromise: we change HISTORY in the emacs-29 branch. If
>> there is a need for an RC2, this change will be part of it. Otherwise,
>> it will appear with Emacs 29.2.
>
> I already changed it.  I have no energy left for these meaningless
> arguments.
>
> I just cannot stop wondering why people keep arguing about these
> minor, almost meaningless issues after their opinions were heard and
> disagreed upon.  Just accept the decision and move on.  But nooo....
>
> So now I will have to regenerate a tarball instead of reusing the same
> one.  Another hour of my time.  No one cares but me, I know.  What
> matters is that they got what they wanted.

>From my POV there's no need to regenerate the tarball.

Best regards, Michael.