Re: emacs-29 82d6bb66fea 4/5: Update HISTORY and ChangeLog.4

[Ulrich Mueller]

>>>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023, Michael Albinus wrote:

> What about this compromise: we change HISTORY in the emacs-29 branch. If
> there is a need for an RC2, this change will be part of it. Otherwise,
> it will appear with Emacs 29.2.

Sure, no need to cut a new tarball if this remains the only change.

>> In the latter case, maybe it should also include a short explanation
>> like "Emacs 28.3 was not released because of ${REASON}."

> I don't know any good wording for ${REASON}, so we shouldn't add a
> reason.

Looks like it simply didn't happen because nobody was enough interested.
>From my distro point of view, there was no strong incentive because we
had already fixed these minor security bugs with downstream patches.