Re: Adding a generic mathematical library

[Emanuel Berg]

Christopher Dimech wrote:

> To get what you want, you have to agree with something.
> Otherwise you get the resistance you have witnessed. I am in
> agreement with Eli on this thing. We should first discuss
> its scope and design.

Relational Algebra - we should have a lot of that as they are
set based and we are list based, and a list is an ordered set
but don't have to be - don't know if we have everything.

Don't know what more math there is. Automata Theory if that
isn't considered computers actually.

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal