Re: Adding a generic mathematical library

[Emanuel Berg]

Christopher Dimech wrote:

>>> Indexing in an everyday task ...
>>
>> Like writing?
>
> Yes, like writing. Referring to elements within a collection
> (like arrays, lists, or strings) using numerical indices, is
> a fundamental concept in programming. Despite its
> simplicity, proper understanding and handling of indexing
> are crucial for writing correct and efficient code.
> Indexing errors, like off-by-one mistakes, are among the
> most common bugs in software development. It shows that
> developers do require a solid understanding as much as
> architects and engineers. Handling indices correctly,
> including understanding when to increment or decrement by
> one, is a critical skill. These seemingly trivial issues can
> lead to significant bugs, from incorrect data processing to
> security vulnerabilities.
>
> The idea that anyone can code to a specific standard without
> foundational knowledge is wrong. While many people can learn
> to write code at a basic level, developing high-quality
> software requires a deeper understanding of algorithms, data
> structures, software design, and debugging techniques.
>
> In fields like architecture and engineering, professionals
> undergo rigorous training to understand the principles and
> practices necessary to ensure safety, functionality, and
> aesthetics in their work. This foundation is not present in
> computing today.

... ? :O

> But, Emanuel has mentioned a different problem, the unusual
> symbol vec that is placed.

Someone else said that, I think?

> And that there is often complex mix of different ways to do
> things, all over emacs, making development very slow paced.

It is one of the reasons, yes - part of the "too much freedom"
reason :)

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal