[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:23:27 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:13:16 +0800, Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> said:
>
> Po Lu> Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:
> >> I guess you mean to *not* delete libXft support? If the issues
> >> surrounding support of color fonts have been fixed [1], then I have no
> >> objections, but I donʼt remember this being discussed.
> >>
> >> Robert
> >>
> >> Footnotes:
> >> [1] I tried testing it a while back, and it crashed my X server 🙂
>
> Po Lu> You must have installed an out of date Xft (and needless to say we
> are
> Po Lu> not concerned with that which crashes the X server). Fedora
> Workstation
> Po Lu> 41 provides 2.3.8, which is sufficiently recent to display color
> glyphs,
> Po Lu> but I'll pass. They are abominable and I heartily prefer Symbola.
>
> I have 2.3.6 here, but thereʼs an interposing remote desktop program
> which does unholy things to the display server, so who knows whoʼs at
> fault 🙂
Come what may, the X server ought never to crash, and if it should, it's
no responsibility of ours. That remains so whatever clients may be
mediating Emacs's connection...
> Po Lu> Likewise, Inconsolata is perfectly functional in Xft:
>
> Po Lu> While Cairo chokes on large images with transforms, or on
> PseudoColor
> Po Lu> screens, and is discountenanced by the GNOME cohort by whom it is
> Po Lu> developed.
>
> Yes, things have changed with regards to Cairo.
>
> Iʼve forgotten how all the various combinations work: does this mean we
> should move (back) to Xft + HarfBuzz by default?
Not yet, but perhaps that would be justified if and when Cairo should
become unmaintained altogether. Of course speaking purely for myself, I
would also like to see the dependency-free font backend enabled in the
Android port adapted to the X desktop, but it's not acutely necessary
right now (nor does it support color fonts or even CFF outlines, as
yet).
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, (continued)
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Robert Pluim, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Visuwesh, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Visuwesh, 2025/03/11
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/11
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion,
Po Lu <=
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/10
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/10
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/11
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/11
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Robert Pluim, 2025/03/11
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/11
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/12
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Robert Pluim, 2025/03/12
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/12
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/12