[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:12:26 +0100 |
>>>>> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:41:50 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
Eli> Robert, since you know more than many of us about the original
Eli> problems with Xft, would it be possible for you to revisit those
Eli> issues with this new version, and see which one(s) of them, if any,
Eli> are still with us? If we are going to change our recommendations in
Eli> this area, we had better knew all the details of what changed wrt what
Eli> we had back when we made these decisions.
In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king 🙂 Po Lu knows more
about this stuff than I do.
I verified Bug#37786 and Bug#30874 on a Xft + HarfBuzz build, it works
as intended. This is with libXft 2.3.6.
And I noticed that Po Lu has already done the work to only exclude
colour fonts on older releases of libXft:
commit cc30758eed9488aed4149adbf7a285622c3ec446
Author: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue Jun 11 16:59:15 2024 +0800
Enable support for color fonts in recent releases of Xft
* etc/PROBLEMS (Some fonts are detected..): Document that Xft
2.3.6 should have resolved this issue.
* src/ftfont.c (ftfont_spec_pattern, ftfont_list): Disable
inhibition of color fonts on Xft 2.3.6 and subsequent versions.
Iʼm neutral on whether we need to warn in configure for older versions
of libXft. On the one hand theyʼre buggy with colour fonts, on the
other hand we ignore those colour fonts anyway.
Robert
--
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, (continued)
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Visuwesh, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Visuwesh, 2025/03/11
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/11
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/11
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/11
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion,
Robert Pluim <=
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/11
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/12
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Robert Pluim, 2025/03/12
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/12
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/12
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/12
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Robert Pluim, 2025/03/12
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Po Lu, 2025/03/10
- Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/11