emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered


From: Robert Pluim
Subject: Re: master 02681b0fbf0 1/2: Don't claim that xftfont is being considered for deletion
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:12:26 +0100

>>>>> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:41:50 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:

    Eli> Robert, since you know more than many of us about the original
    Eli> problems with Xft, would it be possible for you to revisit those
    Eli> issues with this new version, and see which one(s) of them, if any,
    Eli> are still with us?  If we are going to change our recommendations in
    Eli> this area, we had better knew all the details of what changed wrt what
    Eli> we had back when we made these decisions.

In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king 🙂 Po Lu knows more
about this stuff than I do.

I verified Bug#37786 and Bug#30874 on a Xft + HarfBuzz build, it works
as intended. This is with libXft 2.3.6.

And I noticed that Po Lu has already done the work to only exclude
colour fonts on older releases of libXft:

    commit cc30758eed9488aed4149adbf7a285622c3ec446
    Author: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
    Date:   Tue Jun 11 16:59:15 2024 +0800

        Enable support for color fonts in recent releases of Xft

        * etc/PROBLEMS (Some fonts are detected..): Document that Xft
        2.3.6 should have resolved this issue.

        * src/ftfont.c (ftfont_spec_pattern, ftfont_list): Disable
        inhibition of color fonts on Xft 2.3.6 and subsequent versions.

Iʼm neutral on whether we need to warn in configure for older versions
of libXft. On the one hand theyʼre buggy with colour fonts, on the
other hand we ignore those colour fonts anyway.

Robert
-- 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]