[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:10:24 -0400 |
SW <address@hidden> wrote:
> Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos <at> hp.com> writes:
>
> > Indeed - I can reproduce that. It happens in org-agenda-get-timestamps,
> > in the call to org-agenda-format-item: this function takes a regexp
> > argument, remove-re, and removes any matches from the string it
> > produces. The regexp is constructed from the *current* date though:
> >
> > (concat
> > (regexp-quote
> > (format-time-string
> > "<%Y-%m-%d"
> > (encode-time 0 0 0 (nth 1 date) (nth 0 date) (nth 2 date))))
> > ".*?>")
> >
> > so it becomes "<2012-04-17.*?>". Hence it removes the date in the third
> > example above, but not in the other two.
> >
> > The question is whether this is intended or not: personally, I don't see
> > any reason for the difference in behavior, so it might be a good idea to
> > generalize the regexp to match *any* year.
> >
BTW, this should be "*any* date": monthly, daily, weekly repeaters would exhibit
the same behavior.
> > Nick
>
> Thanks for the reply. Do I need to file this as a bug, or does this thread
> constitute a bug report?
I'll let the maintainers decide a) whether it's a bug and b) whether a
formal bug report is needed.
> I'm behind a firewall/proxy and haven't setup email in
> Emacs, so I would just copy and paste the message from org-submit-bug-report
> and
> email it? I'm not (yet) an elisp-er, so I can't fix this myself.
>
Yes, that would be the procedure.
Nick
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, (continued)
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Brian van den Broek, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Brian van den Broek, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, SW, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, SW, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Brian van den Broek, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Nick Dokos, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, SW, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, SW, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Nick Dokos, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, SW, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda,
Nick Dokos <=
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Bastien, 2012/04/20
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, SW, 2012/04/20
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Nick Dokos, 2012/04/20
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Samuel Wales, 2012/04/20