[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:46:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> so it becomes "<2012-04-17.*?>". Hence it removes the date in the third
> example above, but not in the other two.
>
> The question is whether this is intended or not
I think this is intended. If timestamps were not removed from today's
date, agenda listing items scheduled/timestamped for today would be less
readable.
--
Bastien
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, (continued)
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Brian van den Broek, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, SW, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, SW, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Brian van den Broek, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Nick Dokos, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, SW, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, SW, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Nick Dokos, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, SW, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Nick Dokos, 2012/04/17
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda,
Bastien <=
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, SW, 2012/04/20
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Nick Dokos, 2012/04/20
- Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda, Samuel Wales, 2012/04/20