[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode
From: |
Thomas S . Dye |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Oct 2015 06:36:59 -1000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.12-1c98835; emacs 24.5.1 |
Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:
>>> The interest of such functionality seems to be limited to people who
>>> maintain broken-but-soon-to-be-fixed documents... It does not seem to
>>> warrant prime real estate in the exporter IMO. Further, I don't think
>>> 'draft' is the correct word for this, but that's of course minor.
>>
>> I couldn't find anything better. Suggestions welcome.
>
> I agree. We already have the org-latex-classes, which a very different
> from latex-proper classes. This seems to cause a lot of confusion.
> Perhaps we can limit such overlap in the future.
>
> It’s a "relaxed" mode. I’m not sure what a good term for this is.
Trial mode?
hth,
Tom
--
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode,
Thomas S . Dye <=
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Eric S Fraga, 2015/10/08
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nick Dokos, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/09
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/10
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Rasmus, 2015/10/11
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/10/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode, Eric Abrahamsen, 2015/10/09