Re: [O] [RFC] Draft mode

[Eric Abrahamsen]

Thomas S. Dye <address@hidden> writes:

> Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>>> The interest of such functionality seems to be limited to people who
>>>> maintain broken-but-soon-to-be-fixed documents... It does not seem to
>>>> warrant prime real estate in the exporter IMO. Further, I don't think
>>>> 'draft' is the correct word for this, but that's of course minor.
>>>
>>> I couldn't find anything better. Suggestions welcome.
>>
>> I agree.  We already have the org-latex-classes, which a very different
>> from latex-proper classes.  This seems to cause a lot of confusion.
>> Perhaps we can limit such overlap in the future.
>>
>> It’s a "relaxed" mode.  I’m not sure what a good term for this is.
>
> Trial mode?

Dry run?