[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments
From: |
Colin Baxter 😺 |
Subject: |
Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jan 2022 14:43:36 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> Juan Manuel Macías <maciaschain@posteo.net> writes:
> Colin Baxter writes:
>> Ah, LaTeX3 - whatever happened to that?
> If you're a LaTeX user, you're already using LaTeX3 to a very high
> extent, even if you don't see it. The current idea is not to
> replace LaTeX2e with LaTeX3 as a new version, but to gradually
> incorporate elements of LaTeX3 into the LaTeX kernel, like the new
> syntax, xparse, etc. LaTeX3 is already present in many aspects of
> LaTeX, and that is an undeniable advance. If anyone is interested
> in the state of the art, this short talk by Frank Mittelbach at
> TUG 2020 is very illustrative:
Yes, I know. My remark was tongue in cheek.
- Org Syntax Specification, Timothy, 2022/01/09
- Re: Org Syntax Specification, Sébastien Miquel, 2022/01/15
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments (was: Org Syntax Specification), Timothy, 2022/01/15
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments (was: Org Syntax Specification), Sébastien Miquel, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Martin Steffen, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Colin Baxter 😺, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Tim Cross, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments,
Colin Baxter 😺 <=
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Greg Minshall, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Eric S Fraga, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Anthony Cowley, 2022/01/16
Re: Org Syntax Specification, Tom Gillespie, 2022/01/17