[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments
From: |
Greg Minshall |
Subject: |
Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jan 2022 07:16:51 -0800 |
Colin,
> > Colin Baxter writes:
> >> Ah, LaTeX3 - whatever happened to that?
...
> Yes, I know. My remark was tongue in cheek.
which leaves open whether your tongue was already in your cheek at:
> Indeed. Compare something like
>
> $g=\lim_{\delta m\to 0}(\delta F/\delta m)$
>
> with
>
> \(g=\lim_{\delta m\to 0}(\delta F/\delta m)\)
?
additionally, fwiw, i was a long time '$...$'-user. at one point i was
betrayed, and switched to '\(...\)'. it may be more to type (i hadn't
noticed the suggestion Eric just sent in), but i liked the
repeatability. and, in terms of parsing, i'm very sympathetic to having
"directional" end markers.
cheers, Greg
- Org Syntax Specification, Timothy, 2022/01/09
- Re: Org Syntax Specification, Sébastien Miquel, 2022/01/15
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments (was: Org Syntax Specification), Timothy, 2022/01/15
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments (was: Org Syntax Specification), Sébastien Miquel, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Martin Steffen, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Colin Baxter 😺, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Tim Cross, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Colin Baxter 😺, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments,
Greg Minshall <=
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Eric S Fraga, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Anthony Cowley, 2022/01/16
- Re: Org Syntax Specification, Tom Gillespie, 2022/01/17