[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezon
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode) |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:34:50 +0000 |
"Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.online> writes:
>> I understand above that it is easier understandable when reading
>> [2023-01-22 Sun 08:29@+1100] as it is assumed by poster (I guess
>> Max)
>> that user will understand that there is +11 hours ahead.
>>
> Yes, the offset here is ambiguous--is it offset from some timezone
> or from UTC?
It is not ambiguous if the user is familiar with standard time format.
The representation above is derived from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601, which allows the following:
<time>Z
If the time is in UTC, add a Z directly after the time without a space.
Z is the zone designator for the zero UTC offset. "09:30 UTC" is
therefore represented as "09:30Z" or "T0930Z". "14:45:15 UTC" would be
"14:45:15Z" or "T144515Z".
<time>±hh:mm
<time>±hhmm
<time>±hh
The UTC offset is appended to the time in the same way that 'Z' was
above, in the form ±[hh]:[mm], ±[hh][mm], or ±[hh].
Negative UTC offsets describe a time zone west of UTC±00:00, where the
civil time is behind (or earlier) than UTC so the zone designator will
look like "−03:00","−0300", or "−03".
Positive UTC offsets describe a time zone at or east of UTC±00:00, where
the civil time is the same as or ahead (or later) than UTC so the zone
designator will look like "+02:00","+0200", or "+02".
> Here is a proposal for a terminology of events that honors
> Ramsey's distinction between events and occurrences and hopes to
> cover all of Org's use cases.
> ...
> ...
> The Org user should be able to toggle timestamp representation.
> In the case of a no-host event, user might toggle between UTC and
> local time. In the case of situated or itinerant event, user
> might toggle among UTC, local time, and local time at the event
> site.
Instead of toggling, would it be better to echo the different formats
like eldoc does + mouse-echo?
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), (continued)
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Max Nikulin, 2023/01/22
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Thomas S. Dye, 2023/01/22
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Max Nikulin, 2023/01/22
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Thomas S. Dye, 2023/01/22
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Jean Louis, 2023/01/23
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Thomas S. Dye, 2023/01/23
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Max Nikulin, 2023/01/23
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Thomas S. Dye, 2023/01/23
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Max Nikulin, 2023/01/23
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Jean Louis, 2023/01/25
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode),
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Thomas S. Dye, 2023/01/24
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Max Nikulin, 2023/01/26
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Thomas S. Dye, 2023/01/26
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Tim Cross, 2023/01/27
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Tim Cross, 2023/01/22
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Max Nikulin, 2023/01/24
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Tim Cross, 2023/01/24
- Re: UTC or not UTC for timestamps in the past ([FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode), Jean Louis, 2023/01/25
- Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/01/19
- Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda, Alexander Adolf, 2023/01/19