[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DISCUSSION] What should we do with undocumented x^(superscript insi
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: [DISCUSSION] What should we do with undocumented x^(superscript inside /round/ braces) syntax? |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:30:19 +0000 |
"Fraga, Eric" <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
> On Saturday, 17 Feb 2024 at 14:06, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> Inconsistent with LaTeX syntax, Org mode not only allows
>> x^{superscript}, but also x^(superscript) with round braces used for
>> grouping.
>
> Inconsistent with LaTeX is not a sufficient reason for removing this, in
> my opinion. Org has /dwim/ elements which make it easier to write some
> expressions than in LaTeX. Another example is ~x^-1~ which works as I
> want but would make no sense in LaTeX (where only the "-" would be
> superscripted, not the 1).
Good point.
Although, do note that unlike x^word, x^(some text) is not documented.
Moreover, options like ^:{} create an impression that only curly braces
are accepted.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>