[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: Maintaining the Maintainers (Sid Kasivajhula)
From: |
Corwin Brust |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: Maintaining the Maintainers (Sid Kasivajhula) |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Dec 2022 13:27:04 -0600 |
Hi Siddhartha!
We're reaching out to let you know that your scheduled talk will start
shortly and we're ready to check you in for your live Q&A session.
If you aren't available for live Q&A please do reply to let us know,
otherwise you can join here and we'll get you sound-checked:
https://bbb.emacsverse.org/b/sac-inw-foz-rhu
Corwin
612-217-1742
612-695-4276 (signal)
corwin@bru.st
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:00 AM Siddhartha Kasivajhula
<siddhartha.kasivajhula@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you for organizing the conference. My proposal is below.
>
> Speaker name (and optional pronunciation) and preferred pronouns:
>
> Sid Kasivajhula (any pronouns, commonly he/him)
>
> Speaker availability and preferred Q&A approach:
>
> Live preferred, any OK.
>
> Availability: No constraints at this time.
>
> Speaker emergency contact information:
>
> skasivaj@gmail.com
> 229-444-4322
>
> Talk title: "Maintaining the Maintainers: Attribution as an Economic Model
> for Open Source"
>
> Talk abstract:
>
> The problem of supporting open source software and contributors is a pressing
> one, and one for which we don't have good solutions.
>
> So many developers today pour their creative energies into freely-distributed
> works only to have those same works of passion turn into a pain in the neck
> when they find themselves eternally on the hook to provide support in
> exchange for minimal or no compensation, and often with limited assistance.
>
> Fundamentally, the reason it's this way is that traditional economic systems
> operate on _supply and demand_ as the basis of value. In such systems, open
> and unlimited availability translates into zero market value, and
> consequently, open source enterprises are not economically sound. Even in
> high profile projects, developers make a living purely through value added
> services rather than from the core of the value of their contributions --
> that is, from the code they wrote. Since, from a market value standpoint,
> _that code is worthless_.
>
> Copyright and patents (not to mention proprietary software) are an attempt to
> address this within the existing economic model by imposing artificial
> scarcity in order to induce market value. In principle, they also provide
> safeguards against appropriation. On the other hand, the unlimited
> availability of creative works is a profoundly good thing from the
> perspective of maximizing value, and thus suppressing it is deeply misguided.
> Organizations like the Free Software Foundation have campaigned against such
> restrictions for some time now, for related reasons; nevertheless, the
> problem of providing a viable economic basis, aside from these crude
> attempts, remains unaddressed.
>
> Attribution-based economics is a new model that aims to remedy this state of
> affairs by changing the basis of value from supply and demand to _collective
> recognition_. This is facilitated by a process of "inheritance attribution"
> where we collectively agree on the extent of inherence of ideas and works in
> other (e.g. derivative) ideas and works, by means of transparent and evolving
> standards. This model is capable of recognizing a much larger set of valuable
> contributions, including forms of value that cannot be coerced into a
> supply-and-demand equation. That is, in this model, there is no need to
> artificially restrict availability in order for something to be considered
> valuable. By virtue of the curious property that innovations on the process
> are themselves subject to the process of recognition in a self-reflective
> way, we gain accuracy, and by the property that agreed-upon standards apply
> equally to all, we gain fairness -- guarantees that are at best tenuously
> present in today's economic systems.
>
> This talk introduces some early experiments with attribution-based economics
> in the Emacs community, and some initial proposals that point the way forward
> on how, with your help, such a system might scale up to larger projects and
> communities far beyond open source.
>
>
> - 5-10 minutes: (brief description/outline)
> Superficial description of the idea and core mechanisms, along with
> summarizing the efforts so far toward setting it up for a small initial core
> of Emacs (and some non-Emacs) packages.
>
> - 20 minutes: (brief description/outline)
> Same as above but more concrete details about the mechanisms involved, the
> specific goals for social experiments in the community (e.g. how the
> prototype packages like Symex.el aim to funnel financial contributions to
> direct as well as upstream (e.g. packages like Paredit and Lispy)
> contributors! Recognizing the giants on whose shoulders we stand is a core
> part of the model). Details of financial model: how financial contributions
> would be treated vs how code and other "work" contributions would be treated
> -- similar to the startup dilution model, except that everyone has an
> opportunity to participate and we all decide how it works!
>
> - 40 minutes: (brief description/outline)
> Probably would cover the same ground as the 20 minute version but in more
> depth. I may take a different approach on the format, for instance there
> might be a "workshop" component that may involve code, and we might look at
> designs for software that could help implement this at scale.
>
>
> Speaker release:
>
> By submitting this proposal, I agree that my presentation at
> EmacsConf 2022 is subject to the following terms and conditions:
>
> The EmacsConf organizers may capture audio and video (a "Recording")
> of my presentation and any associated materials, which may include
> slides, notes, transcripts, and prerecording(s) of my presentation
> that I provide to the EmacsConf organizers.
>
> I authorize the EmacsConf organizers to distribute, reproduce,
> publicly display, and prepare derivative works of the Recording and
> any derivative works of the Recording (the "Licensed Materials")
> under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
> International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.
>
> I grant to the EmacsConf organizers permission to use my name,
> likeness, and biographic information in association with their use
> of the Licensed Materials under the above license.
>
> I represent that I have the authority to grant the above license to
> the EmacsConf organizers. If my presentation incorporates any
> material owned by third parties, I represent that the material is
> sublicensable to the EmacsConf organizers or that my use of them is
> fair use.
- Re: Proposal: Maintaining the Maintainers (Sid Kasivajhula),
Corwin Brust <=
- Re: Proposal: Maintaining the Maintainers (Sid Kasivajhula), Siddhartha Kasivajhula, 2022/12/07
- video and Q&A for Maintaining the Maintainers, Sacha Chua, 2022/12/07
- Re: video and Q&A for Maintaining the Maintainers, Siddhartha Kasivajhula, 2022/12/08
- Re: video and Q&A for Maintaining the Maintainers, Siddhartha Kasivajhula, 2022/12/10
- Re: video and Q&A for Maintaining the Maintainers, Siddhartha Kasivajhula, 2022/12/10
- Re: video and Q&A for Maintaining the Maintainers, Sacha Chua, 2022/12/10
- Re: video and Q&A for Maintaining the Maintainers, Esteban Ordóñez, 2022/12/10
- Re: video and Q&A for Maintaining the Maintainers, Siddhartha Kasivajhula, 2022/12/10
- Re: video and Q&A for Maintaining the Maintainers, Siddhartha Kasivajhula, 2022/12/21
- Re: video and Q&A for Maintaining the Maintainers, Siddhartha Kasivajhula, 2022/12/21