> If somebody wants to try to make autotools to support the building
> of Qt5-based ftinspect, new configure should be added to freetype-demos,
> to check the availability of the extra libraries for ftinspect?
> Or, such check should be added to existing freetype/configure, even
> if libfreetype itself has no dependency with them?
This is definitely a "me too" moment. Am in the middle of ripping out the librsvg code and replacing it with skia in ftview/ftgrid, and rather annoyed that librsvg is detected in freetype2's configure rather than freetype2-demo's own. Freetype2 itself definitely has no dependency on librsvg and cairo!