[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code
From: |
Michael Meier |
Subject: |
[Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:14:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20060926) |
Hello
Is the Boolean really impelemented? (with all the associated methods,
well, 2 in this case...) The documentation says so, though as far as I
concern server/asobject/Boolean.cpp it is not implemented. I also
compiled testsuite/actionscript.all/Boolean.swf and ran it with gnash:
The methods print out a message saying they are not implemented yet:
14:57:45: boolean_tostring:unimplemented
and so on.
I downloaded the source with cvs about 1 hour ago.
Why does the doc say those functions are implemented and they are not?
Or am I missing a big point? In this case sorry in advance. I just
started going through some parts of the gnash source in order to
understand it.
cheers,
Michael
- [Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code,
Michael Meier <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code, strk, 2006/11/17
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code, Michael Meier, 2006/11/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code, strk, 2006/11/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code, strk, 2006/11/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code, Michael Meier, 2006/11/19
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code P.S., Michael Meier, 2006/11/19
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code, strk, 2006/11/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Implementation: Doc vs. Code, mark cox, 2006/11/21