[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:27:17 -0400 |
Tom Lord wrote:
> I do not propose to implement it literally but, can I get some (quick,
> not prolonged) feedback on the idea of adopting the general idea of:
>
> http://srfi.schemers.org/
>
> as the procedure for managing Arch standards documents?
Looks like a more formalized RFC process. My hip-shot answer is that it
looks like something that would go well with the voting system.
But before we talk about that, have you read my mail yet about the new
release process I'd like to institute? I've sent you two copies and I
haven't received an answer to either of them.
--
James Blackwell Try something fun: For the next 24 hours, give
Smile more! each person you meet a compliment!
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, David Allouche, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, David Allouche, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, James Blackwell, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, David Allouche, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Tom Lord, 2004/09/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Tom Lord, 2004/09/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process,
James Blackwell <=