Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process

[David Allouche]

On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 18:26 +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 06:13:54PM +0200, David Allouche wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 01:29 +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 05:37:29PM -0500, John Meinel wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > This is very similar to python's Python Enhancement Proposals (PEP)
> > > > http://www.python.org/peps/
> > > 
> > > Except the PEP description is wordier and less detailed, and
> > > accomplishes very little. So that's a red herring.
> > 
> > PEP is a different process than SRFI.
> 
> <snip list of things not relevant to the process>

We must be using different definition of "process" then. I will not play
dictionary games with you.

I took your message as an opportunity to attract the attention of
receptive readers to differences between SRFI and PEP which I consider
important and relevant to the definition of the arch proposal process.

You can bring a horse to the water, but you cannot make him drink.

-- 
                                                            -- ddaa