Re: [GNU-linux-libre] FreeSlack: In search of FSF certification

[Ivan Zaigralin]

I have hard time figuring out the license for these:

font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz
font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz

No-mod clause is present in these:

font-bh-ttf-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz
font-bh-type1-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz

On Monday, August 08, 2016 11:54:17 you wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:59:46AM -0700, Ivan Zaigralin wrote:
> > Thanks! I can confirm the fonts. And actually, other Luxi fonts share the
> > same license, so they are all as good as gone.
> 
> Which other luxi fonts do you mean exactly (name of packages)?
> 
> > ap/ghostscript-9.19-x86_64-2.txz is clean: I am looking at the source, and
> > there is no jpegxr folder. Slackware must be using a clean version.
> 
> Yes, it seems so. However, jpegxr is still mentioned in the LICENSE file.

I am assuming that's OK.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.