[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] xorg-fonts (was:FreeSlack: In search of FSF certif
|
From: |
Henry Jensen |
|
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] xorg-fonts (was:FreeSlack: In search of FSF certification) |
|
Date: |
Tue, 9 Aug 2016 12:07:33 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:58:01AM +0200, Henry Jensen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 01:15:51PM -0700, Ivan Zaigralin wrote:
>
> > I have hard time figuring out the license for these:
> >
> > font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz
> > font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz
> >
> > No-mod clause is present in these:
> >
> > font-bh-ttf-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz
> > font-bh-type1-1.0.3-noarch-1.txz
>
>
>
> You're right about font-bh-typewrityper and I removed it from the
> ConnochaetOS'
> repo.
I meant font-bh-type1 ...
>
> But am am not sure about font-bh-ludicatypewriter. Gentoo claims this fonts
> are "public domain" [0]
>
> Furthermore Trisquel (and Debian) have this fonts included as part of
> their xfonts-100dpi and xfonts-75dpi package. So I think it is okay to keep
> them until someone have seriously doubts.
>
> [0]
> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/media-fonts/font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi