[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpl licensing
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: gpl licensing |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Dec 2006 09:16:23 +0100 |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
[...]
> If you want analogies, Intellectual Property is to Patents, Copyrights,
> Trademarks and Trade Secrets what "All Living Beings Have Lungs" is to
> amoebas, cattle and afids.
>
> A false expression, disguised of sensible generalisation.
"As we read the Framers' instruction, the Copyright Clause empowers
Congress to determine the intellectual property regimes that, overall,
in that body's judgment, will serve the ends of the Clause." Eldred v.
Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003).
Intellectual property is a term for various legally protected rights
in ideas and their expression. It includes copyrights, patents (in US,
both stem from US Constitution's Copyright Clause), trademarks (US
Constitution's Commerce Clause), trade secrets (evolved from the
common law), among other rights. Countries around the world recognize
intellectual property rights, although laws vary.
Intellectual property is a form of property which, like physical
property, can be bought or sold, inherited, licensed or otherwise
transferred, wholly or in part. Accordingly, some or all of the
rights may subsequently belong to someone other than the first owner
and may be shared.
Intellectual property is property, that is to say, it belongs to
someone who has the right to exclude others from using it without his
or her consent. Second, intellectual property has attributes that
distinguish it from personal property and real property -- that is why
we have a different word for it. For example, the enforcement of an
owner's exclusive right to use physical property may be accomplished
more easily, as a practical matter, than enforcement of an exclusive
intellectual property right.
Prolific and learned Chief Judge Frank Easterbrook who called Wallace
Williams and told Williams that "copyright and patent laws give
authors *a right* to charge more... [to promote innovation]".
regards,
alexander.
--
"So now they're going to try the hard work of cracking 'Freedom'. Free,
well that means stuff you don't pay for"
-- Eben Moglen ("Moglen: How we'll kill the Microsoft Novell deal")
- Re: gpl licensing, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, rjack, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Aragorn, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, rjack, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/05
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/05
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/05