[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpl licensing
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: gpl licensing |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:07:18 +0100 (CET) |
[...] Property is property, that is to say, it belongs to someone
who has the right to exclude others from using it without his or her
consent.
Entierly true.
Intellectual property is property.
No, since a) "intellectual property" has no meaning and b) you cannot
own something that does not exist in a physical manifestation, like
intellectuality, ideas, or any other intangible concept.
- Re: gpl licensing, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/12/05
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/05
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/06
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/12/06
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/06
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/06
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03