[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpl licensing
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: gpl licensing |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Dec 2006 15:46:26 +0100 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
>
> [...] Property is property, that is to say, it belongs to someone
> who has the right to exclude others from using it without his or her
> consent.
>
> Entierly true.
>
> Intellectual property is property.
>
> No, since a) "intellectual property" has no meaning and b) you cannot
> own something that does not exist in a physical manifestation, like
> intellectuality, ideas, or any other intangible concept.
Uh moron. You can own it because intellectual property laws make
information not free. They make information into a form of property.
Do you have a bank account? Money is also intangible.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: gpl licensing, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/06
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Richard Tobin, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/12/04
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03