[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A GNU “social contract”?
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: A GNU “social contract”? |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Oct 2019 22:27:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 03:59:38PM -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Ok. So that sounds like a good idea, but how is this different from
> what is sent to GNU maintainers today when they are dubbed as
> maintainer (I attached it at the end of this message)? It seems to
> tick all the boxes...
maybe it ticks too many boxes... It is not quite a "short, concise
document". And it is also mostly technical. What is missing is the spirit
of the expected contributions, what it is all about, rather than a
technical guide of what to do in what situation. It is definitely not a
document which could found a community.
Andreas
- Re: A purely GNU system?, (continued)
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Florian Weimer, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Joel Sherrill, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/11/11
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/09
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/13
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?,
Andreas Enge <=