[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A purely GNU system?
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: A purely GNU system? |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Nov 2019 21:31:50 +0100 |
* Andreas Enge:
> Now, some musing, which motivated me to change the subject line into
> a new thread: I am wondering how functional a system is that
> contains only GNU packages? It will lack a graphical environment,
> but with grub, hurd, glibc and all other low level projects and the
> toolchain, emacs, it looks to me as if we still have a functional
> system. Or am I missing something?
Is glibc purely GNU? It borrows code from a variety of sources and
was not written completely from scratch. (Although there are many
parts which are unique to glibc, too.)
What about GNU tar? It started out as pdtar.
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, (continued)
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/07
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/11/07
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/09
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- A purely GNU system? (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system? (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?,
Florian Weimer <=
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Joel Sherrill, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/11/11
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/09
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/13
Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/01