[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
From: |
Alexandre François Garreau |
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Feb 2020 19:14:44 +0100 |
Le samedi 22 février 2020, 18:41:48 CET Ludovic Courtès a écrit :
> Hi Alex,
>
> Alex Taylor <altsamtaylor@gmail.com> skribis:
> > Recently we have been "invited" to approve a thing which is being
> > called the "social contract".
>
> I don’t think you have been invited to anything since you’re not in the
> ‘maintainers’ file.
>
> I’m fine with you expressing your opinion, but please keep in mind that
> it’s a discussion to be had first and foremost among GNU stakeholders.
>
> It’s unfortunate that we’ve seen people not involved in GNU be much more
> vocal than GNU hackers on this list. It’s not been helping.
As far as I heard from the beginning, you all were invited to have these
discussions on private GNU lists, but refused and it’s you who wanted to
do that on a public mailing-list…
> PS: It’s telling that yet another insulting message passed moderation!
Wait it was criticizing but where were the insults?
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, (continued)
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Federico Leva (Nemo), 2020/02/26
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Amin Bandali, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/23
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/23
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/23
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed,
Alexandre François Garreau <=
- Re: lese majeste, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2020/02/23
- Re: lese majeste, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/23
- Re: lese majeste, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/23
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: lese majeste, orbulon, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Andreas R., 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mike Gerwitz, 2020/02/22