[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
|
From: |
Mike Gerwitz |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
|
Date: |
Sat, 22 Feb 2020 22:22:21 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 18:41:48 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> PS: It’s telling that yet another insulting message passed moderation!
Insults deserve condemnation, not censorship.
"Insulting" is highly subjective, and a slippery slope for blocking
messages.
I've personally prevented many dozens of messages from reaching this
list, and I seldom moderate myself. But not before having made an
attempt to (publicly) stop the behavior.
--
Mike Gerwitz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, (continued)
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/22
- Re: lese majeste, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2020/02/23
- Re: lese majeste, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/23
- Re: lese majeste, Alexandre François Garreau, 2020/02/23
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: lese majeste, orbulon, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Andreas R., 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed,
Mike Gerwitz <=
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/23
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/25
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Mark Wielaard, 2020/02/27
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Siddhesh Poyarekar, 2020/02/27
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, siddhesh, 2020/02/27