Re: [open-cobol-list] cobc implementation question. (Curiosity, not critique).

[Brian Tiffin]

I'm not 100% sure, but I'm going to say yes.

Roger implemented the extra layer of headers to ease the complexity with C versus COBOL nested scoping issues.

Once you have nested call graphs, I can see there would be cases where the .l.h files would be included in more than one place.

Will need to look to verify that I didn't just lie to everybody.

Cheers,

Brian

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Charles Anthony <address@hidden> wrote:

When I examine the generated code, I see that <basename>.l<n>.h files
are generated, containing "local variables". The files are appear to
be include only once. Is there a reason that the include files are not
expanded inline? (I.e. is there a scenario where they are included in
more then one locatiion?)

-- Charles

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
open-cobol-list mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-cobol-list