Re: [open-cobol-list] cobc implementation question. (Curiosity, not critique).

[Sergey Kashyrin]

Hi Charles,

The reason is that the content of this file is collected during the whole generation process (i.e. we are inserting into it AFTER we 
wrote a lot of statements into ".c"), so we need to write that into separate file anyway and than we will have to merge.
Why just not to use include ?

Regards,
Sergey

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles Anthony" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:11 PM
Subject: [open-cobol-list] cobc implementation question. (Curiosity,not 
critique).


> When I examine the generated code, I see that <basename>.l<n>.h files
> are generated, containing "local variables". The files are appear to
> be include only once. Is there a reason that the include files are not
> expanded inline? (I.e. is there a scenario where they are included in
> more then one locatiion?)
>
> -- Charles
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> open-cobol-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-cobol-list