[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: safe renegotiation bug?
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: safe renegotiation bug? |
Date: |
Sat, 22 May 2010 21:45:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I have added tests/safe-renegotiation/srn5.c in which a client with
> support for safe reneg connect to a server without support for safe
> reneg. The handshake succeeds (as expected), however the call to
> gnutls_safe_renegotiation_status in the server, after the handshake,
> indicates that the session is using safe renegotiation -- this seems
> like a bug to me. Nikos/Steve, could you take a look?
Should be ok now. I get aborts in the srn5 but they seem intended?
- safe renegotiation bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/22
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?,
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <=
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/22
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2010/05/22
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Tomas Mraz, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Tomas Mraz, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/31