[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: safe renegotiation bug?
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: safe renegotiation bug? |
Date: |
Sat, 22 May 2010 22:38:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <address@hidden> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> I have added tests/safe-renegotiation/srn5.c in which a client with
>> support for safe reneg connect to a server without support for safe
>> reneg. The handshake succeeds (as expected), however the call to
>> gnutls_safe_renegotiation_status in the server, after the handshake,
>> indicates that the session is using safe renegotiation -- this seems
>> like a bug to me. Nikos/Steve, could you take a look?
>
> Should be ok now. I get aborts in the srn5 but they seem intended?
I fixed that now -- however it seems there is another problem, now the
rehandshake succeeds against a server that doesn't support safe
renegotiation. The second handshake in srn5 should fail, shouldn't it?
/Simon
- safe renegotiation bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/22
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2010/05/22
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?,
Simon Josefsson <=
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2010/05/22
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Tomas Mraz, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Tomas Mraz, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2010/05/28
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Simon Josefsson, 2010/05/31
- Re: safe renegotiation bug?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2010/05/31