[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Oct 2001 11:53:28 +0100 |
Hi Bernd,
> > To be really conformant with the troff output format, the following
> > would be ideal:
> >
> > m r red green blue
> > m k cyan magenta yellow black
> > m c cyan magenta yellow
> > m g gray
> > m d
>
> If the arguments are garanteed to have a fixed length the separating
> blank can be omitted. But if an argument has a variable length it
> must be followed by white space.
cstr54 already says that whitespace is required whenever parsing would
be ambiguous otherwise, so that seems to cover this case.
Ralph.
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/10/21
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/21
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/10/23
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/23
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/10/26
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/10/27
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/10/27
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/27
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/27
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/27
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, Stewart C. Russell, 2001/10/22
- Re: [Groff] inconsistencies with color specification, Gaius Mulley, 2001/10/22