[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Obsolete Df command?
From: |
Bernd Warken |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Obsolete Df command? |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 02:26:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 08:04:48PM -0000, Ted Harding wrote:
>
> "\D'f n'" must be available: too much would need removing if
> it were removed (and 'pic' would need revising). However, provided
> mapping old troffout "Df n" to the new syntax is equivalent,
> it may well be retained in that way.
>
Df could be mapped to DFg by
Fgray = (1000 - fgray) * 65536/1000
because fgray ranges from 0 (white) to 1000 (black).
So it's mirrored (1000-...) and then scale from 1000 to 65536.
Ok?
Bernd
- [Groff] Obsolete Df command?, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/30
- RE: [Groff] Obsolete Df command?, Ted Harding, 2001/10/30
- Re: [Groff] Obsolete Df command?,
Bernd Warken <=
- [Groff] end position of D commands, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/30
- Re: [Groff] end position of D commands, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/10/31
- Re: [Groff] end position of D commands, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/31
- Re: [Groff] end position of D commands, Ted Harding, 2001/10/31
- Re: [Groff] end position of D commands, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/31
- Re: [Groff] end position of D commands, Ted Harding, 2001/10/31
- Re: [Groff] end position of D commands, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/31