[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Groff] Obsolete Df command?
|
From: |
Daniel Senderowicz |
|
Subject: |
RE: [Groff] Obsolete Df command? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:03:00 -0800 (PST) |
>"\D'f n'" must be available: too much would need removing if
>it were removed (and 'pic' would need revising). However, provided
>mapping old troffout "Df n" to the new syntax is equivalent,
>it may well be retained in that way.
grn uses \D'... , so I think it should stay.
Dan
- [Groff] Obsolete Df command?, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/30
- RE: [Groff] Obsolete Df command?, Ted Harding, 2001/10/30
- Re: [Groff] Obsolete Df command?, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/30
- [Groff] end position of D commands, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/30
- Re: [Groff] end position of D commands, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/10/31
- Re: [Groff] end position of D commands, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/31
- Re: [Groff] end position of D commands, Ted Harding, 2001/10/31
- Re: [Groff] end position of D commands, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/31
- Re: [Groff] end position of D commands, Ted Harding, 2001/10/31
- Re: [Groff] end position of D commands, Bernd Warken, 2001/10/31
- RE: [Groff] Obsolete Df command?,
Daniel Senderowicz <=