[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:46:27 +0100 |
Hi Ted,
> I would like to suggest that, before anything is done generally in
> groff, we should get to the bottom of where this ":p" is coming from.
I agree. Google's Code Search finds some interesting stuff. Not all
-mm, but still.
http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=%22nr+%3Ap%22
In particular, it seems :C is used to indicate :p should be reset on a
`.H 1'.
Co-incidentally, Russ Cox, one of the Google guys behind Code Search,
may be familiar from Bell Labs.
Cheers,
Ralph.
- [Groff] Re: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number control?, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/09/16
- [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number control?, Ted Harding, 2007/09/16
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number control?, Larry Jones, 2007/09/16
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/09/16
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, M Bianchi, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Keith Marshall, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Jon Snader, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Gunnar Ritter, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Ralph Corderoy, 2007/09/18
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Larry Jones, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Groff] RE: Small bug in groff 1.19.2 footnote number contro, Luke Kendall, 2007/09/18