[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] The future redux
From: |
Deri James |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] The future redux |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:42:45 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.10.28-desktop-1.mga3; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Wed 26 Feb 2014 13:46:22 Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> What do you want in a man page? Videos? 3D holograms?
Only if they would help give an answer to the question you are trying to
answer!
> XTerm does not constrain nothing. It does what is expected from a
terminal.
> Do you think your lawnmower needs a fix because you can take a ride on
it?
> It's not a motorcycle.
It probably depends on the size of the lawn.
> Man pages are not tutorials or complete manuals, they're just an
> aide-mémomire. It takes more time to open Okular than reading what
you
> need!
A simple, but completely unreliable, test, just opening a man page with
and without okular:-
address@hidden ~]$ time man df
real 0m1.577s
user 0m0.033s
sys 0m0.008s
address@hidden ~]$ time man -t df
real 0m1.863s
user 0m0.483s
sys 0m0.064s
The unreliability is down to the speed I can press Q or Alt-F4, but it does
show that you are correct that okular is slower to start, by about .3 of a
second. Of course, if you are not already in a KDE environment, then the
start time for okular would include the whole kde stack, making it very slow
indeed. If such is the case, and, since you are using xterm rather than
konsole, it probably is, then perhaps using xpdf rather than okular would
improve your experience.
> Seriously guys, you need a big dose of Common Sense.
My post was intended to point out that groff (rather than nroff) is still
useful for man pages, for people who find it easier to read if the content is
typographically superior to reading terminal text. My mistake was to not
mention that other pdf readers may be more suitable for individual
setups.It may be necessary to alter the man.config command I gave for
other pdf readers.
Cheers
Deri
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Clarke Echols, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Deri James, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Walter Alejandro Iglesias, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Clarke Echols, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Walter Alejandro Iglesias, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Federico Lucifredi, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux,
Deri James <=
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Mike Bianchi, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Deri James, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Mike Bianchi, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, James K. Lowden, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Walter Alejandro Iglesias, 2014/02/27
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2014/02/27
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Walter Alejandro Iglesias, 2014/02/27
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Charlie Kester, 2014/02/27
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/02/27