[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] The future redux
From: |
Charlie Kester |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] The future redux |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:31:23 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed 26 Feb 2014 at 19:55:31 PST James K. Lowden wrote:
Luckily, the terminal is also the solution. Or, rather, a different
terminal would be. I call it VT-roff:
http://www.schemamania.org/troff/vt-roff.pdf
Interesting article. Thanks for sharing it.
My first reaction was to wonder why not simply have a commandline
driving graphical output in another window. But I see your point about
having a history connecting commands to the output. I'm just not sure
how often I would actually need that.
Disagree with your assertion that ncurses-based apps are dead or dying.
For example, there are a lot of people using mutt for email and the
non-GUI version of vim for general text editing, and these (and many
other ncurses apps) are actively maintained.
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Federico Lucifredi, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Deri James, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Mike Bianchi, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Deri James, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Mike Bianchi, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, James K. Lowden, 2014/02/26
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Walter Alejandro Iglesias, 2014/02/27
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2014/02/27
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Walter Alejandro Iglesias, 2014/02/27
- Re: [Groff] The future redux,
Charlie Kester <=
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/02/27
- Re: [Groff] The future redux, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2014/02/27
Re: [Groff] The future redux, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/02/26
Re: [Groff] The future redux, Pierre-Jean, 2014/02/25
Re: [Groff] The future redux, hohe72, 2014/02/26