[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] text variants
From: |
Steffen Nurpmeso |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] text variants |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:06:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
s-nail v14.8.5-206-gfc8f312-dirty |
Dave Kemper <address@hidden> wrote:
|On 11/23/15, Dave Kemper <address@hidden> wrote:
|> groff_char does seem to address this issue regarding other glyphs. It
|> says, "Entries marked with `***' denote glyphs for mathematical
|I was finally going to do this but hit a snag: it turns out commit
|07a6233adeb476611f7a286295935cbbf6b9cbbd ("complete notes in tables,"
|done by Bernd Warken) removed the *** marker from all rows that
|previously contained it, while leaving the explanatory text of what
|the marker signifies.
Thanks for analyzing your issue, that changeset i blindly took.
--steffen
- Re: [Groff] text variants, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/15
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2015/12/15
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/15
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2015/12/15
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Dave Kemper, 2015/12/26
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2015/12/26
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/26
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Dave Kemper, 2015/12/27
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/26
Re: [Groff] text variants, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2015/12/15
Re: [Groff] text variants,
Steffen Nurpmeso <=