[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] text variants
From: |
Steffen Nurpmeso |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] text variants |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Dec 2015 19:16:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
s-nail v14.8.5-206-gfc8f312-dirty |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
|> I wonder what those "+" markers are for, they have been added in
|> [48615a4].
|
|Uh, oh, a lot of them are lost :-( As documented in the man page, they
|indicate that the (two-letter) glyph name is documented in the
|original troff manual.
It seems i have searched only for the + as a symbol, not as
a word. Hm.
|I fear that Bernd won't be able to fix this due to personal issues, so
|maybe someone can check the groff_char man page from version 1.22.2,
|re-adding the plus signs.
I think the attached should do so. It looses many of Bernd's
changes since i've reverted his commit as a first step, but that
mostly affects the greek alphabet and i think adding an, e.g.,
"omicron" comment for "omicron" is not really a loss. Then i've
checked against [2f4fdb0].
Note i haven't really read all that thorougly. One future day
when i convert the manual to mdoc(7) i will.
Ciao,
--steffen
groff-f9de108.diff
Description: Text Data
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Dave Kemper, 2015/12/15
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/15
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2015/12/15
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/15
- Re: [Groff] text variants,
Steffen Nurpmeso <=
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Dave Kemper, 2015/12/26
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2015/12/26
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/26
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Dave Kemper, 2015/12/27
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/26
Re: [Groff] text variants, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2015/12/15
Re: [Groff] text variants, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2015/12/15