[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] cmdline: pass kernel command line as verbatim
From: |
Daniel Kiper |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] cmdline: pass kernel command line as verbatim |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Apr 2020 12:57:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 04:55:52PM +0800, Michael Chang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:18:26AM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > Am Sat, 4 Apr 2020 13:31:40 +0800
> > schrieb Michael Chang <address@hidden>:
> >
> > > 7 files changed, 229 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > A lot of churn. It is called 'verbatim', yet it inserts extra characters in
> > the output buffer.
>
> What verbatim means when people read that from the manual is really not
> up to me. Here my attempt was merely to fix problem as you did but
> mostly reflecting my own point of view. Afterall the table provided in
> the description can easily be used as reason to turn down the patch if
> it really not making sense on the premise that we have agreed on a real
> fix would be looking like, be it yours, mine or anyone else's proposal.
>
> > I'm still stunned why there is an argument about the obvious bugfix.
>
> It is absolutely bugfix, however any prospective impact on grub.cfg that
> a bugfix would introduce is always a thing for upstream to adopt it.
Michael, thank you for preparing the patch.
Olaf, Michael, I chatted with Vladimir and he told me that the commit
introducing the "issue" was deliberate change. I asked him to explain
here what problem it fixes and how to fix the breakage introduced by the
fix... Yeah... :-) Sadly as he told me the issue is complicated and the
real fix is not easy. Anyway, I hope that he will be able to chime in
soon and shed more light at this long standing problem. So, finally we
will be able to provide the solution...
Daniel