[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can guile be implementation independent?
From: |
silas poulson |
Subject: |
Re: Can guile be implementation independent? |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:32:01 +0000 |
Uncertain if anymore but Guile provides list of r7rs incompatiblities
here
<https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R7RS-Incompatibilities.html>
Silas
> On 17 Dec 2021, at 03:01, Jacob Hrbek <kreyren@rixotstudio.cz> wrote:
>
> Looks interesting, are there any known limitations in relation to Guile?
>
> On 12/17/21 03:53, Nala Ginrut wrote:
>> Hi Jacob!
>> You may take a look at akku.scm
>> You can write r7rs code and use Guile as one of the compiler alternatives.
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021, 09:43 Jacob Hrbek <kreyren@rixotstudio.cz> wrote:
>>
>> I am used to working with common lisp where i can write code that is
>> "implementation independent" meaning that following a specific coding
>> style makes it compatible across multiple interpretators/compilers
>> (sbcl, LispWorks, etc..)
>>
>> Is there a way to do the same on GNU Guile? Like writing a code
>> that can
>> be interpreted by implementations that are following the IEEE
>> 1178-2008
>> or R7RS standard?
>>
>> -- Jacob Hrbek
>>
> --
> -- Jacob Hrbek
> <publickey - kreyren@rixotstudio.cz - 1677db82.asc>
Re: Can guile be implementation independent?, Maxime Devos, 2021/12/17
Re: [EXT] Can guile be implementation independent?, Thompson, David, 2021/12/17